Pageviews past week

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

R. Kelly v Chris Brown

Hello World,

In this section, we will review (double standards) two singers that have somehow got themselves into more trouble than one of BeBe’s kids playing on a fence. Just incase you were hiding with Bin Ladin or in a coma I will catch you up to the situation then give you all different point of views.

Culprit #1: R. Kelly: He was accused of being a pisser. Some how he managed to piss on a teenage girl…on tape…and thought nothing was wrong with the entire situation. Really? He should have known something was wrong with it when the thought of just squirting yellowish liquid over a little girl. Looks like someone has been taking his FloMax. But seriously, how does that even translate to sex? Like, if I walk around pissing on myself all day, will my pussy rate increase? But that’s not the point right now.

Culprit #2: Chris Brown: We see a little “kiss-kiss” went a little too far. No one wants to wake up from a slumber and see some “nerd candy” looking figure on his lip. But lets get back on track. He is now looked down upon by the public for going “Ape Shit on her ass” and “coming at her like a Spider Monkey”. After all, on the radio, they did say she had two knots on her forehand looking like a ram. To sum all this up though, Chris Brown beat up his girlfriend Rihanna. Word came out that he even choked his little umbrella toting princess. Damn, RiRi, how DO you breathe with no air?

Since the recent actions of Chris Brown, some radio stations have stopped playing his music because of the dispute he had with his girlfriend. Do you really think this is fair? In the U.S. alone 5 wives or girlfriends get beat everyday (sited from myself) and no one treats them any different. But on the other hand, R. Kelly pisses on someone and can still make songs talking about “let me pour up a glass of lemonade” to be played on the radio? Not saying one is more right than the other, but where should the line be drawn? How is a known pedophile and pisser still getting this kind of support? In the beating case, the woman was hitting back, and, this is just me speaking, but if she hit me I’m gonna hit her harder.

The question is this: should Chris Breezy’s songs be banned from the radio and not Robert Kelly? Both were wrong, but what Chris Brown did is not anything new so why should he be treated any different? Any ladies care to offer their opinion? Would you rather your man hit you or piss on you?

Signing Out

1 comment:

  1. sometimes thats just the way of the world. kelz pissed on a no name chick who was asking for it and breezy slapped rihanna, barbados' sweetheart. had he slapped renika then this would have barely made a blip on the radar. 2, breezy is in the era of TMZ and the smoking gun which is bad for all celebrities. kelz just missed the tmz boat by a year or so and he had a tape that went triple plat. kinda of funny how we judge people so harshly off of hearsay but ease up when they have a tape. let a tape of chris hittin her surface and watch how the tide changes. and C, we can do without "no air" but how many black stations are not going to play 'step in the name of love', honestly. deuces

    ReplyDelete